Now, Tell Me Again Why I'm Not 'Artsey'?

A certain scrapbooker of controversial renown has once again stirred the scrapping pot with one of her layouts. The layout in question is journaled with an excerpt from a conversation that the 'artist' had with another of her ilk. This statement pretty much announced her distaste for people who aren't 'artsey'.

At first glance, I thought, "Whoa! Excuse the crap out of me! I'm sorry that I don't qualify to reside within your sphere of irrational existence!", but then I took it down about 500 notches and started looking at why I felt offended by the statement that the 'artist' had every human right to make. The end of my mini voyage of self discovery uncovered a personal identity crisis and a seed of self doubt. I'll expound:

I am a jack of lots of trades when it comes to crafting and because my interests branch out so much, I don't identify myself solely with any crafting group. Because I don't really 'belong' to a group exclusively, garnering acceptance from any one group has been difficult to put it nicely.
It was my lack of an "identity" that allowed me to feel as if I were being shunned by the anti-non-artsey layout. The responsibility for the way that I choose to see myself lands in MY lap, not that artist.

I brought this whole thing up to my husband when he called me during a break at work. He was very blunt and to the point having reached his 'eureka!' moment without the need of self discovery. "Why wouldn't you consider yourself artsey?" he asked, "All of the crafting you do falls into the realm of Arts and Crafts, so that makes you an 'Arts & Craftey' person; save some syllables and call yourself "artsey" and go to bed". Aside from trying to send me off to bed before I was ready to go, I found his comment extremely helpful.

My husband couldn't have hit that nail squarer on the head if he tried. All of the uproar and feelings of dejection that have been generated by that layout is the result of each interpreter's personal assessment of their self worth. In short, if you don't see yourself as artsey, then you will be offended, if you can manage to get over yourself long enough to see that you ARE artsey, then you won't (unless you decide to lead the charge on behalf of the non-artsey folks).

Scrapbooking is a craft that is in it's very essence is the artistic manifestation of a preserved memory. If it weren't artistic then it would just be pictures in a album; no journaling, no pretty patterned paper, no embellishments. This whole "just a scrapbooker" thing really does torque me when I hear it used in the recent context. Why do we have to personally devalue our hobby?

I know lots of non-artsey folks who hold more regard for scrapbooking than the women who actually partake in the craft! The ladies at work have called me 'artsey' as long as I can remember...I wish I'd remembered that before I'd allowed myself to be annoyed by the journaling in that layout. I don't begrudge KC for admitting that she doesn't like artsey people simply because :

• She didn't elaborate on what her idea of 'artsey' is therefore it's very possible that her journaling isn't as exclusionary as some of her past statements have been. Even if she does mean that she thinks all un-edgy scrappers are 'just lowly scrappers', so what? I refuse to re-align my self worth assessment to match her presumably narrow view of scrapbooking.
• I can only be insulted when I allow myself to be, I like to think that I rob any antagonist of the power to devalue me by first valuing myself and then by not allowing their input any purchase on my self perception.
• That woman is not responsible for buffering each individual scrapbooker's sensitive psyche; she may alienate herself by being so in-you-face and controversial, but that's HER bed to make and lay in. Some people appreciate the presence of all sorts of people in their lives, artsey or not. If someone wants to draw a line between themselves and the non-artsey world, then that's their choice to make. It's really about us. Momma would say that you didn't need nobody who don't want you.

At the risk of sounding like I'm preaching, I have to say that we as scrapbookers need to start checking our emotions at the door as it pertains to the opinions of others. We really need to start valuing what we do instead of watering it down for fear of being labeled pretentious or self absorbed.

If you play with scissors, paper, and glue... you might be artsey

How can anyone expect the non-scrapbooking people to have respect or appreciation for our craft if we don't even have it? We are not "just scrapbookers"! The memories that I strive to preserve are given my attention because they are important to me, that means that scrapbooking is important to me, and therefore not "just" or "only" anything. The time that I spend honing my craft (yes I did just write that) is not time wasted therefore why attach a negative connotation to my crafting?

It's funny how many scrapbookers are okay with being called 'creative' but deplore being referred to as 'arty' or 'artsey'...the words are synonymous! If what you create (there's that word again!) is aesthetically pleasing to people who view it, then it is an artistic representation of your creative spirit (yes, I did just write that). Heck people, even the dictionary is calling us artsey!

Artistic, adj.: 1. of art or artists, 2. done skillfully and/or tastefully, 3. sensitive to beauty Synonyms: inventive, skillful, creative, talented, aesthetic, imaginative (to name a few)

Arty (artsey), adj.: affectedly artistic

Artist, n.: 1. one who is skilled in any of the fine arts, 2. one who does anything very well, 3. a professional in any of the performing arts. Synonyms: master, painter, composer, dancer, creator, singer, (and the list goes on)

If create something aesthetic to be appreciated by others... you might be artsey.

I'm not trying to drag anyone to the waterhole kickin' and screamin'. If you don't want to consider yourself artsey, then don't (I'll still consider you artsey...so there!). Maybe it would be worthwhile to remind those who chose to take that route, that they are in essence allowing themselves to be included in that alienated group of non-artsey people. I hope that everyone chooses the positive route, whatever it is and ceases with the devaluing "just" and "only" tags that we attach to what we do with out memories.

Shameless rant session over.

If you are an investment banker who spends his/her free time...well doing more investment banking... you probably aren't artsey

What's beauty got to do with it?

I read the following comment from one of the people that have commented on this blog and I was so taken aback by the eloquence and focus that I think it deserves recognition...and further contemplation:
**************************************************************************

The focus on appearance is an interesting topic. There has occasionally been some good discussion before it degenerates into character assassination and random uncalled for comments directed towards specific individuals. The problem comes from the fact that the magazines are all about marketing, and beautiful people and ideal looking lifestyles will sell. So, for someone wanting to be published, it becomes a serious topic to be considered because if one doesn't fit that mold, it could possibly (and I say that since I have no sure knowledge) make a difference in whether or not someone is published.

There's a lot of talk about wanting to see "real life" in the magazines, but let's face it. In this particular industry, "real life" doesn't sell. I think many of us are brought up to believe that utopia can happen if we work hard enough. So we buy magazines that show us beautiful people, beautiful homes, beautiful lifestyles and beautiful layouts that we too can have if we work hard enough.I think this holds true much more when it comes to your "celebrity" scrapbookers, which has been brought up repeatedly. Unfortunately, it doesn't work as a topic because you can only agree or disagree before everyone starts naming names.

Anyway, maybe I'm being a little Pollyanna, but I'm hoping that all of these blogs are opening some eyes and will lead to improvements. And I'm hoping that it comes to a point where we can have good, honest discussion without all of the vulgarities and insults. Do we really have so little of substance to share, especially among a group of women who have a hobby in common, that we have to result to school yard behavior? I'd like to think we do.
Anonymous
**************************************************************************

I too have been reduced to shaking my head in shame and embarrassment when I look at the way that this hobby has evolved into yet another manifestation of the superficiality that runs rampant in our society.

I think that the poster hit on something when she said that "real life"doesn't sell. Look at the 'scripted' reality TV series that we are being bombarded with. The marketing gurus of the industry are looking for more and more ways to make money, and the scrapbooking industry is suffering under the weight of it's sudden "Extreme Makeover".

Honestly, I would identify more with a scrapper that I saw in a mag if I could see myself identifying with her on a human level first. The fact that the industry has become entangled in the appearance game has pretty much turned me away from it. Instead of trying to force feed us their perception of what a perfectly scrappy person/lifestyle would look like, I think that shift of focus in in order. Perhaps the first step in the restructuring should be that WE start dictating to THEM what a perfectly scrappy life is.

You would think that considering the demographic for the magazines, the editors would've thought it through better. Seriously, the magazines are primarily for scrapbookers who are, as a majority, women. Do we have to be bombarded with images of the "worthy' beautiful people when we are looking at scrap mags? What does something as benign as GOD seeing fit to retrofit me with a beaker instead of a petite nose have to do with my personal level of talent?

Some would argue that magazines like Vogue are just as guilty, but I think it's cabbage and tomatoes. Cosmo is focuses on fashion and some of that fashion is geared towards a particular (highly unattainable without starvation) body type. Therefore, there is a need for that body type to be represented in the image offerings. To use the same business model for scrapbooking is essentially saying that we can't obtain the levels of desired accomplishment without being physically "marketable' for the magazine/company. It's yet another medium that is sending an exclusionary message to the female masses. That message is one that whispers of inadequacy and shortcomings. That message is that talent isn't the most important prerequisite. But do you really need to be a bombshell supermom to step foot on the industry ladder? What does that have to do with anything that is important to the scrapbooker?

For some reason, all of this is tying right back to the almighty dollar. It really isn't a surprise that the backlash is such that it is. Long gone are the days when we would just sit in the eaves content to see another sister succeed. Today, we can discern that our level of talent is comparable to what we are being sold, and in doing this, we've begun to make our way through the multi-layered industry smokescreen and see the truth of the situation. That truth doesn't necessarily nurture the sisterhood; rather, it seems to only work to rip it apart. By taking our differences and using them as a means to divide instead of unify, the industry has helped create this monster.

BUT! Before we all start shouting in unified voices of revolt, we must turn that finger of blame at ourselves as well. The industry's machinations are only as powerful as we allow them to be. Some have fallen hook line and sinker for the 'standards' and have thus begun to hold their own courts in which they judge a fellow scrapbooker by her physical appearance. It's one thing to stereotype, it's another thing to call another human being ugly and untalented. I would be hard pressed NOT to believe that anyone who is capable of tying physical appearance and artistic talent together is truly a case study in human insecurity. Honestly, what directional choice does the industry have when personal attacks based on appearance are witnessed? The cry for the 'average, everyday' scrapbooker to be represented is pretty darned loud, but equally as loud are the blatantly superficial, borderline racist personal attacks that reverberate from some of these same scrappers.

Whatever happened to everyone being beautiful in their own right? What ever happened to 'if you don't have anything nice to say, say nothing? Whatever happened to the belief that beauty is only skin deep?

Here's a question: Are the personal attacks that some are subjected to a result of something besides apathy for their being in the spotlight? Is the 'you're ugly, therefore you're unvalidated' attitude serving any purpose other than to lend credence to the negative stereotypes about crafters/scrapbookers? I know, women are known to be 'catty' at times, but that is a matter of personal choice and is not genetic or otherwise inherent. So why are so many of us choosing to follow this destructive course of behaviour? Is it really easier to tear down others? Is there really more emotional benefit to devaluing someone based on something that person has little control over?

Life is too short...

...to spend it deliberating over paper and embellishment choices. Memories are being made while you preserve the moments of yesterday. Get'er done and get back to living!

...to spend shopping. The accumulation of 'stuff' that you can't take with you. Wow, either we are the most altruistic souls on the planet or we've lost touch with the days gone buy where a trip to the store was strongly linked to a need that needed fullfilling (and I don't mean the need to shop).

...to try to change people. If we were all the same then there would be nothing to argue about. As hard as it is, embracing our differences and *gasp* trying to see if there is anything at all that we can absorb from them, is something that we could all probably stand to benefit from.

...to sweat the small stuff. Someone's 'title' (self appointed or not), bugs you? Why do you allow it to? Human beings are granted the will to ignore things that we choose not to give our attention to...I know this because I catch my daughter trying to do it everytime I tell her it's naptime. If it's not your cup of tea, perhaps it's better to accept that it may very well be someone else's. I catch myself asking myself, "does such and such's behaviour impact my life?" if not, I don't sweat it. Embrace your inner ignore button.

...to spend it trying to convince people that they aren't special. We are all special, in our own way. No, I don't want anyone to hold my hand! I'm just saying that why is it important that everyone else on the planet not annoy us? Isn't our choice to be annoyed? Why are we so above scrutiny that we can try to tear someone down for being different than we are?

Is Scrapbooking Losing Ground?

I received my Joann's flier last week and I was somewhat shocked at what I slowly began to realize about it. If you have the flier, go ahead and open it up. Do you remember this time last year? The fliers that were published 'back in the day' had scrapbooking offerings literally spilling off of their dedicated 2-page spreads. You could find DCWV paper pack sales on the front page and maybe a tote or something elsewhere besides the 'scrapping' deals' page. I used to spend a few minutes just trying to take in all that was offered and creating a list of wants and needs based on the offerings. By the time I'd weeded out the wants from the needs, a good 20 minutes had elapsed, but it was time well spent in my opinion.

Now, you need a magnifying glass and a lot less deliberation. There is hardly anything being offered up. I'm not saying that there is little that interests me, I'm saying there is little there period.

The Michael's fliers, prior to Martha's line being launched, seemed to be a showcase platform for jewelry making and floral arranging supplies with scrapbooking getting a meager honorable mention.

Is this the first sign of the industry's imminent implosion? All of these years of systematic over saturation have to be taking it's toll in some way, shape or form. Is this the first sign? Or is it just the result of a slump in interest on the behalf of the scrapbooker? Perhaps, the consumer has grown tired of the way that they sells much of their products at a price that is10-20% above their competitor's (you know, you have to compensate for that 'generous', but limited 40% off coupon)? Perhaps all of the coupon word play and restrictions that M's and J's corporate implemented in the past have finally convinced many of us that it's just not worth it? Maybe all of those resolutions to freeze our wallets have resulted in a perceived lack of interest in the hobby? Is the online shopping arena finally gaining ground with their attractive sales and shipping deals?

Whatever it is, I know that it's not my imagination. I used to go to Joann's for lunch a couple of times a week (you absorb far less calories that way) and I would have to maneuver through the crowded scrapbooking section every single time. Now, when I occasionally go there at lunch, it's like a ghost town, though I must admit that I walk past the scrapbooking stuff enroute to the jewelry finding and beads. If I had a nickel for every time that I thought that now would be a the perfect time to get hoard happy...well, I'd have a lot of nickels.

If this is the first step towards implosion, then pray tell, what is the next one? Is this a good thing? Or will this come back and bite us in the behind? Will this atrophying (if that is indeed what it is) eventually expand to encompass the beloved online arena as well?